From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Etheridge v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1925
105 So. 923 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

2 Div. 331.

June 30, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dallas County; S. F. Hobbs, Judge.

Possessing a still.

Arthur M. Pitts and A.D. Pitts, both of Selma, for appellant.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The evidence fails to connect defendants, or either of them, with possession of the stills found. The affirmative charge should have been given for defendants. Hobdy v. State (Ala.App.) 100 So. 571; Biddle v. State, 19 Ala. App. 563, 99 So. 59; Moon v. State, 19 Ala. App. 176, 95 So. 830; Farmer v. State, 19 Ala. App. 560, 99 So. 59; Medders v. State, 19 Ala. App. 628, 99 So. 776; Watts v. State, 19 Ala. App. 549, 98 So. 914.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Etheridge v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1925
105 So. 923 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Etheridge v. State

Case Details

Full title:Leroy ETHERIDGE et al. v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 30, 1925

Citations

105 So. 923 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
21 Ala. App. 669