Opinion
Civil Action 4:21-cv-03002
05-05-2022
JAMARQUIS ETHERIDGE, Plaintiff. v. AT&T, INC., et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On April 4, 2022, Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. 11) was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). See Dkt. 19. Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation on April 19, 2022, recommending that Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. 11) be GRANTED and this case be dismissed without prejudice. See Dkt.20
No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(B)(3).
Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 20) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and
(2) Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. 11) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
It is so ORDERED.