Opinion
2:23-cv-00322-JAD-EJY
10-24-2023
Antonio Corrillo Estrella, Plaintiff v. Ricardo Ramirez, et al., Defendants
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING ACTION [ECF NO. 15]
Jennifer A. Dorsey, U.S. District Judge
On June 5, 2023, the court recommended that plaintiff Antonio Corrillo Estrella's claim be dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint by July 18th. The copy of that order mailed to Estrella was returned as undeliverable. So on June 6th, the magistrate judge ordered for Estrella to update his address by July 7th. Estrella was warned that his failure to update his address by that deadline would result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed.
ECF No. 10.
ECF No. 11. I accepted the recommendation to dismiss the case with leave to amend on June 30th, and that order was returned as undeliverable, too. ECF No. 14.
ECF No. 12.
Id.
When Estrella did not update his address and filed nothing by July 18th, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to comply with court orders. Estrella had 14 days after being served with the report and recommendation to object, and he neither filed objections nor moved to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do.
ECF No. 15.
Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [ECF No. 15] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.