From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estrella v. New York City Tr. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 22, 2004
6 A.D.3d 305 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

3453N.

Decided April 22, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered June 16, 2003, which granted plaintiffs' motion to amend the complaint to add a cause of action under General Municipal Law § 205(e), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Steve S. Efron, New York, for appellant.

Mitchell R. Schrage Associates, PLLC, New York (Jeffrey A. Kaplan of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Lerner, JJ.


The motion was properly granted upon a record showing that the facts underlying the amendment were made known to defendant-appellant at an early stage of the action, and where the amendment seeks only to add a new theory of liability based on those facts ( see Falk v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 249 A.D.2d 238).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Estrella v. New York City Tr. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 22, 2004
6 A.D.3d 305 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Estrella v. New York City Tr. Auth

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ESTRELLA, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 22, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 305 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 139

Citing Cases

Walls v. Prestige Management, Inc.

Walls is not simply seeking to add a theory based on facts previously alleged in the Civil Court complaint.…

Roberts v. Liberty Lines Transit, Inc.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, J.), entered May 17, 2019, which, to the extent…