From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estrada v. Strainer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2021
2:11-cv-2871 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)

Opinion

2:11-cv-2871 KJN P

06-15-2021

ISAC ESTRADA, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL STRAINER, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); Local Rule 305(a).

On April 27, 2015, the undersigned granted petitioner's motion to stay this action in order for petitioner to exhaust additional claims. (ECF No. 48.) On May 20, 2021, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. (ECF No. 49.) Petitioner did not respond to the motion to dismiss.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this order, petitioner shall show cause for his failure to oppose respondent's motion to dismiss; failure to respond to this order will be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion to dismiss.


Summaries of

Estrada v. Strainer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2021
2:11-cv-2871 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Estrada v. Strainer

Case Details

Full title:ISAC ESTRADA, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL STRAINER, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 15, 2021

Citations

2:11-cv-2871 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)