Opinion
No. 4-05-00155-CR
Delivered and Filed: February 1, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.
Appeal from the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2003-CR-8170, Honorable Bert Richardson, Judge Presiding. Affirmed.
Sitting: Catherine STONE, Justice, Karen ANGELINI, Justice, Sandee Bryan MARION, Justice.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Rudolfo Estrada pleaded nolo contendere to the offense of possession with intent to deliver heroin in an amount of one gram or more but less than four grams and was placed on community supervision for a term of ten years. The trial court, however, subsequently revoked Estrada's community supervision. Upon revoking Estrada's community supervision, the trial court sentenced Estrada to six years imprisonment and fined him $1,200. We affirm. Estrada's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Estrada filed a pro se brief in response to the Anders brief, contending his appeal is meritorious because there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court's judgment. After reviewing the record, court-appointed appellate counsel's brief, and the pro se response, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Bledsoe v. State, No. PD-300-04, 2005 WL 3057799, *3 (Tex.Crim.App. Nov. 16, 2005). The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Furthermore, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.).