From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estrada v. Sanders

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
May 10, 2007
223 F. App'x 543 (8th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-2700.

Submitted: May 4, 2007.

Filed: May 10, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

Danna Johnson, argued, Independence, MO, pro se.

Robert J. Bjerg, Seigfreid Bingham, argued, Kansas City, MO, for Appellees.

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Danna Johnson appeals from the district court's dismissal of her pro se civil complaint for failure to state a claim. Upon de novo review, see Farm Credit Servs. of Am. v. Am. State Bank, 339 F.3d 764, 767 (8th Cir. 2003) (de novo standard of review), we conclude that the district court correctly dismissed Johnson's complaint as barred by the statute of limitations, see Basham v. Fin. Am. Corp., 583 F.2d 918, 927 (7th Cir. 1978) (failure to bring action under TILA within one year bars action). We decline to consider Johnson's claims raised for the first time on appeal. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912 914 (8th Cir. 2004) (declining to address pro se claims and arguments raised first on appeal).

The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.


Summaries of

Estrada v. Sanders

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
May 10, 2007
223 F. App'x 543 (8th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Estrada v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:Danna JOHNSON, Appellant, v. ACCREDITED HOME LENDERS, INC., a California…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: May 10, 2007

Citations

223 F. App'x 543 (8th Cir. 2007)