From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estrada v. Healey

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 3, 2016
137 S. Ct. 226 (2016)

Summary

noting that the petitioner did not cite authority "establishing a due process right to the timely disclosure of exculpatory evidence discovered after his conviction" and that Osborne "explicitly declined to extend Brady's pre-trial protections to the post-conviction context"

Summary of this case from Waterford v. Washburn

Opinion

No. 16–5362.

10-03-2016

Jacob ESTRADA, petitioner, v. John Francis HEALEY, Jr., et al.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Estrada v. Healey

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 3, 2016
137 S. Ct. 226 (2016)

noting that the petitioner did not cite authority "establishing a due process right to the timely disclosure of exculpatory evidence discovered after his conviction" and that Osborne "explicitly declined to extend Brady's pre-trial protections to the post-conviction context"

Summary of this case from Waterford v. Washburn
Case details for

Estrada v. Healey

Case Details

Full title:Jacob ESTRADA, petitioner, v. John Francis HEALEY, Jr., et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Oct 3, 2016

Citations

137 S. Ct. 226 (2016)
196 L. Ed. 2d 174

Citing Cases

Waterford v. Washburn

Some courts have interpreted Osborne to stand for the proposition that the prosecution is obligated to…

Alvarez v. City of Brownsville

Banks v. Dretke, 540 U.S. 668, 691, 124 S.Ct. 1256, 157 L.Ed.2d 1166 (2004) ; Burge v. St. Tammany Par., 336…