From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estrada v. Cheshire

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Apr 17, 2014
Cause number: 01-14-00014-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 17, 2014)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-14-00014-CV

04-17-2014

Hector Estrada, Iselda Estrada, Maria Martinez, and Jorge Gonzales v. Daner Lee Cheshire, Lyndon Charles Cheshire, and Stewart Title Company


ORDER ON MOTION

Date motion filed*: April 1, 2014 Type of motion: Motion to substitute counsel Party filing motion: Appellees Document to be filed: __________ Is appeal accelerated? No If motion to extend time:

Original due date: __________

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date:

Date Requested: __________
Ordered that motion is:

[v] Granted
If document is to be filed, document due:
[ ] Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant motions to extend time
[ ] Denied
[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
[ ] Other: __________
Appellees Daner Lee Cheshire and Lyndon Charles Cheshire have filed a motion to substitute counsel, which is granted. See TEX. APP. P. 6.5(d). The Clerk of this Court is ordered to substitute attorney Timothy A. Hootman for Rhoda Ross as appellees' counsel of record. We further notify appellees that this substitution will not affect any pending deadlines in this appeal.
Judge's signature: Evelyn V. Keyes

[×] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court
Panel consists of __________ November 7, 2008 Revision


Summaries of

Estrada v. Cheshire

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Apr 17, 2014
Cause number: 01-14-00014-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Estrada v. Cheshire

Case Details

Full title:Hector Estrada, Iselda Estrada, Maria Martinez, and Jorge Gonzales v…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Apr 17, 2014

Citations

Cause number: 01-14-00014-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 17, 2014)