From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 6, 2008
525 F.3d 821 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 05-75850.

May 6, 2008.

Saad Ahmad, Law Offices of Minter Ahmad, Fremont, CA, for Petitioner.

District Director, Office of the District Chief Counsel U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, Alison R. Drucker, Donald E. Keener, Ernesto H. Molina, Jr., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Agency No. A76-339-422.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 6, 2008
525 F.3d 821 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey

Case Details

Full title:Juan Elias ESTRADA-ESPINOZA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 6, 2008

Citations

525 F.3d 821 (9th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey

Thereafter, upon the vote of a majority of the nonrecused active judges, the case was ordered reheard en banc…