From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estopinales v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
May 20, 2015
165 So. 3d 757 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 4D15–516.

2015-05-20

Yoni Javier ESTOPINALES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Yoni Javier Estopinales, Blountstown, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara McCarthy, Judge; L.T. Case No. 05–16297 CF10A.
Yoni Javier Estopinales, Blountstown, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice the trial court's denial of appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence. Regarding appellant's claim for additional jail credit, he may file a sworn and legally sufficient rule 3.801 motion within the time remaining under the rule. SeeFla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(c) (setting forth the required contents for such a motion). As for appellant's claim that his Broward and Volusia County sentences were to run concurrently, he may file a sworn motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, alleging that such was an express condition of his plea, if he can do so in good faith. See, e.g., Bruce v. State, 679 So.2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Affirmed without prejudice.

GROSS, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Estopinales v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
May 20, 2015
165 So. 3d 757 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Estopinales v. State

Case Details

Full title:YONI JAVIER ESTOPINALES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: May 20, 2015

Citations

165 So. 3d 757 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)