From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estes v. Bommarito Hyundai Isuzu

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Dec 24, 1996
936 S.W.2d 590 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 70466

OPINION FILED: December 24, 1996

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and James R. Reinhard and Gary M. Gaertner, JJ.

Sheldon Weinstein, St. Louis, for claimant-appellant.

Steven R. Sharp, St. Louis, for employer-respondent.



ORDER


Christopher Estes appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the Administrative Law Judge's denial of benefits. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Estes v. Bommarito Hyundai Isuzu

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Dec 24, 1996
936 S.W.2d 590 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Estes v. Bommarito Hyundai Isuzu

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER ESTES, Claimant-Appellant, vs. BOMMARITO HYUNDAI ISUZU…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE

Date published: Dec 24, 1996

Citations

936 S.W.2d 590 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)