Opinion
CASE NO.: SC14-1212 Lower Tribunal No(s).: 2013CA000093
07-01-2014
KEITH R. ESTEP, ET AL. Petitioner(s) v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. Respondent(s)
The petition for writ of prohibition is hereby denied as successive. See Jenkins v. Wainwright, 322 So. 2d 477, 478 (Fla. 1975)(declaring that once a petitioner seeks relief in a particular court by means of a petition for extraordinary writ, he has picked his forum and is not entitled to a second or third opportunity for the same relief by the same writ in a different court). LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test:
__________
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court
sh
Served:
BRENT M. BUCKMAN
JOEY EVAN SCHLOSBERG
LOUIS M. URSINI, III
CHRISTOPHER ADAM ROACH
PAUL MARSHALL PHILLIPS
HON. JEFFREY R. SMITH, CLERK
DARYL LAFAYETTE JONES
HON. CYNTHIA L. COX, JUDGE