Opinion
2023-1242
09-11-2024
ESTECH SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant v. KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor
JOHN WITTENZELLNER, Williams Simons & Landis PLLC, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by FRED WILLIAMS, Austin, TX. MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by PETER J. AYERS, WILLIAM LAMARCA, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.
This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-00574.
JOHN WITTENZELLNER, Williams Simons & Landis PLLC, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by FRED WILLIAMS, Austin, TX.
MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA,
argued for intervenor. Also represented by PETER J. AYERS, WILLIAM LAMARCA, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.
JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM.
LOURIE, LINN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.