From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ESTATE OF WU v. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 19, 2001
281 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued February 16, 2001.

March 19, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant Hinck Electrical Contractors, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Klein, J.), entered September 3, 1999, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it, and the defendants Town of Brookhaven and County of Suffolk separately cross-appeal, as limited by their respective briefs, from so much of the same order as denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ronan, McDonnell Kehoe, Melville, N.Y. (Kevin P. Slattery of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Ahmuty, Demers McManus, Albertson, N.Y. (Frederick B. Simpson and Brendan T. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for respondent-appellant Town of Brookhaven.

Robert J. Cimino, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Anthony P. Moncayo of counsel), for respondent-appellant County of Suffolk.

Tomao and Marangas, Garden City, N.Y. (Theodora A. Marangas of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, HOWARD MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motions are granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendants Hinck Electrical Contractors, Inc., Town of Brookhaven, and County of Suffolk, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The Supreme Court erred in denying the motions of the defendants Hinck Electrical Contractors, Inc., Town of Brookhaven, and County of Suffolk for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them. These defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law and the plaintiff failed to raise a material issue of fact requiring a trial (see, CPLR 3212[a]; Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557).


Summaries of

ESTATE OF WU v. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 19, 2001
281 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

ESTATE OF WU v. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN

Case Details

Full title:ESTATE OF XIANG DING WU, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 19, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 802