From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Treadwell v. Wright

The Supreme Court of Washington
Sep 5, 2003
149 Wash. 2d 1035 (Wash. 2003)

Summary

In Wright v. Treadwell (14 Tex. 255), Chief Justice Hemphill in deciding a similar question merely says: "The rights of the attorneys under the assignment were subordinate to those of the appellee and can not control his superior equity to have the set-off as demanded."

Summary of this case from McManus v. Cash Luckel

Opinion

No. 73670-7.

September 5, 2003.

Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 50274-3-I, January 27, 2003, 115 Wn. App. 238.


Denied September 5, 2003.


Summaries of

Estate of Treadwell v. Wright

The Supreme Court of Washington
Sep 5, 2003
149 Wash. 2d 1035 (Wash. 2003)

In Wright v. Treadwell (14 Tex. 255), Chief Justice Hemphill in deciding a similar question merely says: "The rights of the attorneys under the assignment were subordinate to those of the appellee and can not control his superior equity to have the set-off as demanded."

Summary of this case from McManus v. Cash Luckel

In Wright v. Treadwell, 14 Tex. 255, the two judgments grew out of the same transaction, which is remarked by the Supreme Court in McManus v. Cash Luckel, 101 Tex. 261, 108 S.W. 800, as distinguishing the two cases.

Summary of this case from Davidson v. Lee
Case details for

Estate of Treadwell v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:Estate of Treadwell, Respondent, v. Wright, et al., Petitioners

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington

Date published: Sep 5, 2003

Citations

149 Wash. 2d 1035 (Wash. 2003)
149 Wn. 2d 1035

Citing Cases

McManus v. Cash Luckel

We will first dispose of the claim of Lovejoy Malevinsky. In Wright v. Treadwell ( 14 Tex. 255), Chief…

Pierson v. Farmers' State Guaranty Bank

Vernon's Sayles' Ann. Rev.Civ.St. art. 1329. That the petition stated a sufficient cause to justify the court…