Opinion
2021-69580 Motion CA 19-02296 CA 19-02297 CA 19-02298
07-27-2021
ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 1.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 2.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 3.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 4.)
Unpublished Opinion
MOTION DECISION
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
Appellant having moved to vacate the dismissal of the appeals taken herein from an amended order and orders of the Supreme Court, Monroe County, entered May 3, 2019, and December 9, 2019, and having moved for other relief, Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied.