Opinion
CA 19-02063 CA 19-02296 CA 19-02297 CA 19-02298
12-31-2019
ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 1.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 2.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (Appeal No. 3.) ESTATE OF WILLIAM SHARPSTEEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL J. WIK, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS CINOLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
PRESENT:
Appellant having moved to consolidate the appeals taken herein from orders and an amended order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County, entered May 3, 2019 (appeal No. 1), and December 9, 2019 (appeal Nos. 2, 3, and 4), and for an extension of time to perfect appeal No. 1,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is granted insofar as it seeks to consolidate the appeals, and the appeals from the orders and amended order entered May 3, 2019, and December 9, 2019, are hereby consolidated for the purposes of perfecting and arguing the appeals.
It is further ORDERED that the motion is granted insofar as it seeks an extension of time to perfect appeal No. 1, the time to perfect appeal No. 1 is extended to March 9, 2020, and, in the event of failure to so perfect, the appeal is hereby dismissed without further order.
It is further ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks an extension of time to perfect appeal Nos. 2, 3, and 4 is dismissed as premature (see 22 NYCRR 1250.10 [a]).
Entered: December 31, 2019
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court