From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Savage v. Kredentser

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 27, 2020
180 A.D.3d 1264 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

527701

02-27-2020

ESTATE OF Joyce SAVAGE et al., Respondents—Appellants, v. Daniel C. KREDENTSER et al., Appellants—Respondents, and St. Peter's Hospital Center of the City of Albany, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Thorn, Gershon, Tymann and Bonanni, LLP, Albany (Erin Mead of counsel), for appellants-respondents. Savage Law PLLC, Beaufort, South Carolina (Denise L. Savage of counsel), for respondents-appellants. Maguire Cardona, PC, Albany (Amanda Kuryluk of counsel), for respondents.


Thorn, Gershon, Tymann and Bonanni, LLP, Albany (Erin Mead of counsel), for appellants-respondents.

Savage Law PLLC, Beaufort, South Carolina (Denise L. Savage of counsel), for respondents-appellants.

Maguire Cardona, PC, Albany (Amanda Kuryluk of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Garry, P.J., Mulvey, Aarons, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Mulvey, J. Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court (Connolly, J.), entered September 20, 2018 in Albany County, which, among other things, partially denied a cross motion by defendants Daniel C. Kredentser and Women's Cancer Care Associates, LLC for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.

Following joinder of issue in this medical malpractice action, plaintiffs moved for, among other things, summary judgment on liability. Defendants Daniel C. Kredentser and Women's Cancer Care Associates, LLC cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. Supreme Court denied plaintiffs' motion and partially denied the cross motion. Kredentser and Women's Cancer Care Associates appeal and plaintiffs cross-appeal.

This Court has previously decided appeals in this action regarding disclosure disputes (167 A.D.3d 1344, 90 N.Y.S.3d 650 [2018] ; 150 A.D.3d 1452, 55 N.Y.S.3d 484 [2017] ).
--------

We have been informed that, during the pendency of these cross appeals, a trial was held on this matter and final judgments have been entered. Therefore, the appeal and cross appeal must be dismissed because "the right to appeal from a nonfinal order terminates upon the entry of a final judgment" ( Augusta v. Kwortnik, 161 A.D.3d 1401, 1403, 78 N.Y.S.3d 726 [2018] ; see McCormack v. Maloney, 148 A.D.3d 1268, 1268–1269, 48 N.Y.S.3d 822 [2017] ). Finally, we note that the judgments were entered in November 2019. It was not until oral argument on January 9, 2020, however, that this Court was first apprised of the entry of these judgments. We take this opportunity to remind the bar that it must immediately notify this Court of any events that will impact a pending appeal and that the failure to do so may result in sanctions (see 22 NYCRR 1250.2 [c] ).

Garry, P.J., Aarons, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal and cross appeal are dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Estate of Savage v. Kredentser

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 27, 2020
180 A.D.3d 1264 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Estate of Savage v. Kredentser

Case Details

Full title:Estate of Joyce Savage et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Daniel C…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 27, 2020

Citations

180 A.D.3d 1264 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
116 N.Y.S.3d 918
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 1412

Citing Cases

Scott RR. v. Kimberly QQ.

For similar reasons, we also reject petitioner's argument that he should not have been sanctioned counsel…

Mfrs. & Traders Tr. v. J.D. Marine Serv.

As an initial matter, we find that the appeal from the August 2018 order must be dismissed as the denial of…