From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Rushing v. AG Private Prot., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 11, 2019
U.S.D.C. Case: 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2019)

Opinion

U.S.D.C. Case: 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC

12-11-2019

ESTATE OF TYLER S. RUSHING, SCOTT K. RUSHING, and PAULA L. RUSHING, Plaintiffs, v. AG PRIVATE PROTECTION, INC., EDGAR SANCHEZ, CITY OF CHICO, CHICO POLICE DEPARTMENT, SCOTT RUPPEL, CEDRIC SCHWYZER, ALEX FLIEHR, JEREMY GAGNEBIN, COUNTY OF BUTTE, BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, IAN DICKERSON, and DOE 1-20, Defendants.


Assigned to the Honorable District Court Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.

ORDER GRANTING CHICO DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR PAGE LIMIT INCREASE RE: REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Action Filed: June 8, 2018

GOOD CAUSE appearing, the Court GRANTS Defendants City of Chico, Chico Police Department, Scott Ruppel, Cedric Schwyzer, Alex Fliehr, and Jeremy Gagnebin's (the "Chico Defendants") request for a page limit increase concerning their Reply to be filed in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment Or, In the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 37). The Chico Defendants' Reply brief shall receive a ten (10)-page limit increase, in addition to the regularly-afforded ten (10) pages, for a total of twenty (20) pages. DATED: 12/11/2019

/s/ John A. Mendez

For the Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.


Summaries of

Estate of Rushing v. AG Private Prot., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 11, 2019
U.S.D.C. Case: 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2019)
Case details for

Estate of Rushing v. AG Private Prot., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ESTATE OF TYLER S. RUSHING, SCOTT K. RUSHING, and PAULA L. RUSHING…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 11, 2019

Citations

U.S.D.C. Case: 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2019)