From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Runyon

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1878
53 Cal. 196 (Cal. 1878)

Opinion

         Appeal from the Probate Court of Sacramento County.

         It appears from the affidavits in the records that there was dissatisfaction on the part of some of the legatees with the annual account of the executrix; but the account was presented to the Court in the absence of counsel for the contestants, and with the statement that it was satisfactory to all interested, and that due notice had been given. Under this belief, the Court made a decree allowing and settling the account. The contestants appealed.

         COUNSEL:

         Benj. Bullard, Jr., J. W. Armstrong, and Add. C. Hinckson, for Appellants.

          A. C. Freeman and Henry Starr, for Respondent.


         OPINION          By the Court:

         It appears by the record in each of these causes that, by reason of irregularities occurring in the proceedings had below, the parties have not been heard, and no proper settlement of the accounts has been had; and in each case the order must be reversed and the cause remanded. Remittitur forthwith.


Summaries of

Estate of Runyon

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1878
53 Cal. 196 (Cal. 1878)
Case details for

Estate of Runyon

Case Details

Full title:Estate of JARED RUNYON

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 1, 1878

Citations

53 Cal. 196 (Cal. 1878)

Citing Cases

In re Trusteeship Under Will of Melgaard

The majority of them involve real ex parte orders, made without notice to or appearance by consent or…

In re Estate of Rose

(McCrea v. Haraszthy , 51 Cal. 147.) It is one which may be reopened (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1637; Estate of…