From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Richards v. Richards

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN
Dec 21, 2011
B226261 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2011)

Opinion

B226261

12-21-2011

Estate of JACK RICHARDS, Deceased. JAMES DUFFER, Petitioner and Appellant, v. NEIL RICHARDS et al., Contestants and Respondents.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BP113558)


ORDER MODIFYING OPINION; NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on December 7, 2011, and not certified for publication, be modified as follows:

On the title page, counsel for contestants and defendants was erroneously listed as:

"Schott P. Schomer; and Jack I. Esensten for Contestants and Respondents."

It should read:

"Scott P. Schomer; and Jack I. Esensten for Contestants and Respondents."

The foregoing does not change the judgment.

_____________________

WOODS , Acting P. J.

_____________________

ZELON, J.


Summaries of

Estate of Richards v. Richards

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN
Dec 21, 2011
B226261 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Estate of Richards v. Richards

Case Details

Full title:Estate of JACK RICHARDS, Deceased. JAMES DUFFER, Petitioner and Appellant…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN

Date published: Dec 21, 2011

Citations

B226261 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2011)