finding no adverse employment action where employer instructed co-workers to ostracize and spy upon employee who had engaged in protected activity
Summary of this case from Barton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.No. 97-1082.
February 23, 1998, October TERM, 1997.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 123 F 3d 586.
finding no adverse employment action where employer instructed co-workers to ostracize and spy upon employee who had engaged in protected activity
Summary of this case from Barton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.finding that "an action may be found to be frivolous under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1 only if the losing party not only `knew or should have known' that the action was `without any reasonable basis in law or equity,' but also that it `could not be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law'."
Summary of this case from Everest v. Newark Div. of Tax Abatediscussing Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Ref. Corp., 72 F.3d 326, 333-34 (3d Cir. 1995)
Summary of this case from Grasso v. West New York B.O.EFull title:ESTATE OF PHILLIPS ET AL. v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 23, 1998
The trial court properly dismissed the retaliation claim. Cf. Munday v. Waste Management of N. Am., Inc., 126…
Chika v. Planning Research Corp.Case law is clear, however, that to establish an adverse employment action there must be "evidence that the…