Estate of Metelitsa v. Penn Med. Princeton Health

Full title: ESTATE OF NATALYA METELITSA by her Administrator and Administrator Ad…

Court: Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Apr 17, 2023

No. A-0191-22 (App. Div. Apr. 17, 2023)

Opinion

A-0191-22

04-17-2023

ESTATE OF NATALYA METELITSA by her Administrator and Administrator Ad Prosequendum, LEONARD METELITSA, and LEONARD METELITSA, individually, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. PENN MEDICINE PRINCETON HEALTH, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, and JOSEPH FRESTA, R.N., Defendant-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, and PETER YI, M.D., JOSEPH PEPEK, M.D., PRINCETON RADIOLOGY, and THERESA AQUINO, M.D., Defendants-Respondents.

Farkas & Donohue, LLC, attorneys for appellant/cross-respondent (Beth A. Hardy, of counsel and on the briefs). Ruprecht Hart Ricciardulli & Sherman, LLP, attorneys for respondent/cross-appellant (Renee J. Sherman, of counsel and on the briefs; Michael J. Di Leo, on the briefs). Blume, Forte, Fried, Zerres & Molinari, PC, attorneys for respondent Estate of Natalya Metelitsa by her Administrator and Administrator Ad Prosequendum, Leonard Metelitsa and Leonard Metelitsa, individually (Michael B. Zerres, of counsel and on the briefs; Richard T. Madurski, on the briefs).

PER CURIAM.

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

Submitted February 8, 2023

On appeal from interlocutory orders of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. L-0482-21.

Farkas & Donohue, LLC, attorneys for appellant/cross-respondent (Beth A. Hardy, of counsel and on the briefs).

Ruprecht Hart Ricciardulli & Sherman, LLP, attorneys for respondent/cross-appellant (Renee J. Sherman, of counsel and on the briefs; Michael J. Di Leo, on the briefs).

Blume, Forte, Fried, Zerres & Molinari, PC, attorneys for respondent Estate of Natalya Metelitsa by her Administrator and Administrator Ad Prosequendum, Leonard Metelitsa and Leonard Metelitsa, individually (Michael B. Zerres, of counsel and on the briefs; Richard T. Madurski, on the briefs).

Before Judges Accurso, Firko and Natali.

PER CURIAM.

This matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties having stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal and cross-appeal, it is hereby ordered that the appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.