From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Heintzelman v. Air Experts, 2008-2173

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 15, 2010
2010 Ohio 3301 (Ohio 2010)

Summary

In Heintzelman, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that in order to bind a third party to a declaratory judgment action filed by an insurer against its insured, the third party must be joined as a party in the declaratory judgment action.

Summary of this case from Selective Ins. Co. of South Carolina v. Reel in the Outdoors, Ltd.

Opinion

No. 2008-2173.

July 15, 2010.

Delaware App. No. 07CAE090045, 2008-Ohio-4883. Judgment of the court of appeals affirmed.


MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS


Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Brown, C.J., not participating.


Summaries of

Estate of Heintzelman v. Air Experts, 2008-2173

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 15, 2010
2010 Ohio 3301 (Ohio 2010)

In Heintzelman, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that in order to bind a third party to a declaratory judgment action filed by an insurer against its insured, the third party must be joined as a party in the declaratory judgment action.

Summary of this case from Selective Ins. Co. of South Carolina v. Reel in the Outdoors, Ltd.
Case details for

Estate of Heintzelman v. Air Experts, 2008-2173

Case Details

Full title:Estate of Heintzelman v. Air Experts, Inc., Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-3264

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jul 15, 2010

Citations

2010 Ohio 3301 (Ohio 2010)
931 N.E.2d 548

Citing Cases

Hicks v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Specifically, the insurer in Bish was attempting to assert declaratory judgment findings against an injured…

Gallegos v. Nevada General Insurance Company

See, e.g., In re Estate of Heintzelman v. Air Experts, Inc., 126 Ohio St. 3d 138, 2010-Ohio-3264, 931 N.E.2d…