Opinion
3:21-cv-00520-MMD-CLB
04-05-2023
Law Offices of Stephen H. Osborne and Doyle Law Office Roper S. Doyle, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs LEMONS, GRUNDY & EISENBERG Alice Campos Mercado, Esq Attorneys for Earle Oki, M.D POLLARA LAW GROUP Dominique Pollara, Esq. Attorneys for Renown Defendants
Law Offices of Stephen H. Osborne and Doyle Law Office Roper S. Doyle, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LEMONS, GRUNDY & EISENBERG Alice Campos Mercado, Esq Attorneys for Earle Oki, M.D
POLLARA LAW GROUP Dominique Pollara, Esq. Attorneys for Renown Defendants
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FIRST REQUEST
Hon. Miranda M. Du Cinef United States District Judge
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs, ESTATE OF JILL ANN ESCHE, SIERRA JILL WOFFORD, by and through here guardian ad litem WAYNE WOFFORD; and CAMRON SCOTT ESCHE (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants RENOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; MARTA J. BUNUEL-JORDANA, MD; CAROLINE VASENDIN, MD, JOHANNA GRUEN, PhD; EARLE OKI, MD; MAEGEN SMITH, RN; CAITLIN E. HERSCHEL, RN; through their respective counsel of record that the time to file a response to RENOWN Defendant's Motion to Strike, Alternatively Motion to Dismiss, Docket No. 38, be extended by one week to November 28, 2022 (November 25th being a holiday). A week extension is necessary to accommodate Plaintiffs' counsels' calendar conflict for another matter, and to resolve reply briefing being due over the Thanksgiving holiday week.
This extension is not sought for purposes of delay or for any other improper purpose.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.