From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Cramer v. City of Oakland

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 16, 2021
19-cv-07922-PJH (N.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)

Opinion

19-cv-07922-PJH

07-16-2021

ESTATE OF TIMOTHY A. CRAMER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSALRE: DKT. NO. 69

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

Plaintiff, by its counsel, advised the court that the parties have reached a provisional settlement of this case. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismis without prejudice and all pending dates are vacated. However, if any party certifies to the court within 90 days that the settlement has not been finalized, this order shall stan vacated and this case shall be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

If no certification is filed, after passage of 90 days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. The parties may, of course, substitute a dismissal with prejudice at any time during this 90-day period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Estate of Cramer v. City of Oakland

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 16, 2021
19-cv-07922-PJH (N.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Estate of Cramer v. City of Oakland

Case Details

Full title:ESTATE OF TIMOTHY A. CRAMER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 16, 2021

Citations

19-cv-07922-PJH (N.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2021)