From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boman v. Cramer (In re Estate of Boman)

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Feb 8, 2017
898 N.W.2d 202 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

Summary

requiring a showing defendants acted "intentionally and improperly" in interfering with plaintiff’s expected inheritance

Summary of this case from Erickson v. Erickson (In re Estate of Erickson)

Opinion

No. 16-0110

02-08-2017

IN RE ESTATE OF Milton A. BOMAN, deceased Wesley Boman, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cynthia Cramer, Individually and as Executor, and Trudy Burford, Defendants-Appellants.

Stephen H. Locher and Emily M. Schirmer of Belin McCormick, P.C., Des Moines, for appellant Cynthia Cramer. Deborah M. Tharnish of Davis, Brown, Koehn, Shors & Roberts, P.C., Des Moines, for appellant Trudy Burford. Nathan J. Schroeder and David J. Dutton of Dutton, Braun, Staack & Hellman, P.L.C., Waterloo, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Boman v. Cramer (In re Estate of Boman)

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Feb 8, 2017
898 N.W.2d 202 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

requiring a showing defendants acted "intentionally and improperly" in interfering with plaintiff’s expected inheritance

Summary of this case from Erickson v. Erickson (In re Estate of Erickson)
Case details for

Boman v. Cramer (In re Estate of Boman)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ESTATE OF Milton A. BOMAN, deceased Wesley Boman…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Feb 8, 2017

Citations

898 N.W.2d 202 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

In re Marriage of Nelson

We agree his lack of authority hinders our review, but opt to overlook his waiver and address the merits.…

Erickson v. Erickson (In re Estate of Erickson)

See id. at 521 ("The necessary proof in an action for intentional interference with a bequest or devise…