Estate Admin. Servs. v. Mohulamu

3 Citing cases

  1. Ogeone v. Au

    No. CAAP-18-0000449 (Haw. Ct. App. Dec. 12, 2023)

    While "submissions of self-represented litigants should be interpreted liberally[,] . . . the right of self-representation is not [] a license not to comply with the relevant rules of procedural and substantive law." Est. Admin. Servs. LLC v. Mohulamu, 148 Hawai'i 10, 18, 466 P.3d 408, 416 (2020) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Accordingly, we consider only those points of error that Ogeone argued, to the extent we can discern them.

  2. Christiana Tr. v. Burke

    No. CAAP-18-0000164 (Haw. Ct. App. Aug. 7, 2023)

    While "submissions of self-represented litigants should be interpreted liberally," and counsel later appeared to represent the Burkes on this appeal, "the right of self-representation is not a license not to comply with the relevant rules of procedural and substantive law." Estate Admin. Servs. LLC v. Mohulamu, 148 Hawai 'i 10, 18, 466 P.3d 408, 418 (2020) (citations, ellipsis, and internal quotation marks omitted). Thus, Elizabeth is the sole appellant.

  3. Kuhlmann v. Burgess

    No. CAAP-21-0000317 (Haw. Ct. App. Sep. 29, 2021)

    See Est.Admin. Servs. LLC v. Mohulamu, 148 Hawai'i 10, 17-18, 466 P.3d 408, 415-16 (2020). Thus, the court will deny the motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in CAAP-21-0000026; and