From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estakhrian v. Obenstine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 26, 2019
Case No. CV 11-3480 FMO (CWx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-3480 FMO (CWx)

03-26-2019

JAMES ESTAKHRIAN, Plaintiff, v. MARK OBENSTINE, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment, IT IS ADJUDGED THAT:

1. Judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiffs on their claims for (1) breach of fiduciary duty; (2) violation of the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq.; and (5) violation of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civil Code §§ 1750, et seq.

2. Defendant Mark Obenstine shall disgorge and pay as restitution to the class members the amount of twelve (12) million dollars he received as attorney's fees in the Watt litigation.

3. Subject to any allocation for attorney's fees and costs to be determined at a later date, each class member's share of the net monetary award shall be computed based on the pro rata recovery each class member received from the Watt settlement. Dated this 26th day of March, 2019.

/s/_________

Fernando M. Olguin

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Estakhrian v. Obenstine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 26, 2019
Case No. CV 11-3480 FMO (CWx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Estakhrian v. Obenstine

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ESTAKHRIAN, Plaintiff, v. MARK OBENSTINE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 26, 2019

Citations

Case No. CV 11-3480 FMO (CWx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2019)