Opinion
Civil No. 06-6226-AC.
June 23, 2008
ORDER
Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta filed Findings and Recommendation (#36) on May 8, 2008, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).
Petitioner has timely filed objections. I have, therefore, given de novo review of Magistrate Judge Acosta's rulings.
I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#36) dated May 8, 2008, in its entirety. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (#2) and petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing are denied and this case is dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.