Opinion
22 CIVIL 7937 (LJL)
01-05-2024
JOSEPH ESPOSITO, individually and on behalf Of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. TIPRANKS, LTD., Defendant.
JUDGMENT
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum and Order dated January 4, 2024, Defendant's motion to dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5), for insufficient service of process is GRANTED. The Complaint is dismissed “without prejudice to refiling,” Olusi v. Keisler, 2008 WL 3539891, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2008) (Chin, J.), and “properly serving” Defendant, Baliga ex rel. Link Motion Inc. v. Link Motion Inc., 385 F.Supp.3d 212, 219 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).