Opinion
(10083)
Argued December 9, 1991
Decision released December 31, 1991
Action, in the first case, to recover damages for legal malpractice, and action, in the second case, to recover legal fees for services rendered to the defendants, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New Haven, where the cases were consolidated; thereafter, the first case was tried to the jury before Clark, J., and the second case was tried to the court; directed verdict and judgment for the defendant in the first case, and default judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the second case, and appeal in the first case to this court, which remanded the matter for further proceedings; on remand, the first case was tried to the jury before Licari, J.; verdict and judgment in part for the plaintiffs, and appeal by the defendant to this court, which dismissed the appeal; thereafter, the court, D. Dorsey, J., denied the motions for audita querela filed by the defendant in the first case, the plaintiff in the second case, and for an order to enforce the judgment in the second case and to enjoin the enforcement of the judgment in the first case, and the defendant in the first case, the plaintiff in the second case appealed to this court. Affirmed.
Daniel V. Presnick, pro se, the appellant (defendant in the first case, plaintiff in the second case).
John R. Williams, for the appellees (plaintiffs in the first case, defendants in the second case).