From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Esposito v. KPC Sport, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 16, 2000

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Michalek, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER AND LAWTON, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and complaint.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court erred in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in this negligence action. Plaintiffs allege that Donald Esposito (plaintiff) was injured when he was caused to fall by a gap between a section of the bleachers at defendant's hockey rink. They allege that plaintiff did not see the gap because the lighting in the facility was poor. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, we conclude that plaintiffs raised an issue of fact whether defendant maintained the premises in a reasonably safe condition ( see, Basso v. Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233, 241; see generally, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562).


Summaries of

Esposito v. KPC Sport, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Esposito v. KPC Sport, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DONALD ESPOSITO AND EILEEN M. ESPOSITO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. KPC…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 16, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 409