From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Esposito v. Herrschaft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1961
13 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

April 3, 1961


Motion by appellants to reverse a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, entered January 23, 1961, after a nonjury trial before a Referee to whom the action was referred to hear and determine, in favor of appellants on the second cause of action and dismissing the first cause of action; and for a new trial. Appellants make the motion on the ground that a proper record is unavailable and, hence, they are prevented from prosecuting their appeal. Motion granted; judgment reversed on the law, without costs, and a new trial granted. The findings of fact made by the Referee have not been considered. It appears that no stenographer was present at the trial and that the Referee's penciled notes constitute the only record of the testimony adduced. The Referee has died, and a search of his files has failed to produce any of his notes or other record of the testimony of the trial. Under the circumstances a new trial must be had. Nolan, P.J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Esposito v. Herrschaft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1961
13 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Esposito v. Herrschaft

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE ESPOSITO et al., Appellants, v. AGNES HERRSCHAFT, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1961

Citations

13 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

Matter of Ernest v. Rosemary

As a result of the deficiencies in the present transcript, however, we cannot fairly assess the basis of the…