From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Esposito v. Capuozzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 2000
269 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted December 22, 1999

February 10, 2000

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Lebowitz, J.), dated January 29, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Vincent D. McNamara, East Norwich, N.Y. (Joseph F. Pusateri of counsel), for appellants.

Michael Swaaley, Staten Island, N.Y., for respondent.

WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO.


DECISION ORDER


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants did not meet their initial burden of setting forth evidentiary facts sufficient to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion (see, Fabbricatore v. Lindenhurst Union Free School District, 259 A.D.2d 660 ).


Summaries of

Esposito v. Capuozzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 2000
269 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Esposito v. Capuozzo

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ESPOSITO, respondent, v. RICHARD CAPUOZZO, et al., appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 10, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
702 N.Y.S.2d 572