From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Espinoza v. Thrasher

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Dec 31, 2014
No. 04-14-00144-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 31, 2014)

Opinion

No. 04-14-00144-CV

12-31-2014

Sandra Y. ESPINOZA, Appellant v. Ruth V. THRASHER, Appellee


MEMORANDUM OPINION

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 391870
Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant's brief was due on October 9, 2014. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. Therefore, on November 19, 2014, we ordered appellant to file, on or before December 1, 2014, her appellant's brief and a written response reasonably explaining (1) her failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee was not significantly injured by her failure to timely file a brief. We explained that if appellant failed to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant has failed to comply with a court order). Appellant has not filed any response to our order. We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Espinoza v. Thrasher

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Dec 31, 2014
No. 04-14-00144-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 31, 2014)
Case details for

Espinoza v. Thrasher

Case Details

Full title:Sandra Y. ESPINOZA, Appellant v. Ruth V. THRASHER, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Dec 31, 2014

Citations

No. 04-14-00144-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 31, 2014)