From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Espinoza v. Horel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 9, 2007
2:06-cv-2625-GEB-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2007)

Opinion

2:06-cv-2625-GEB-KJM-P.

April 9, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 19, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 19, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Espinoza v. Horel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 9, 2007
2:06-cv-2625-GEB-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2007)
Case details for

Espinoza v. Horel

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL L. ESPINOZA, Petitioner, v. ROBERT A. HOREL, Acting Warden, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 9, 2007

Citations

2:06-cv-2625-GEB-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2007)