From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Espinoza v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 7, 2021
No. 9882-21 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 7, 2021)

Opinion

9882-21

06-07-2021

Alexander Espinoza Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

It has come to the Court's attention that the petition filed in this case on March 15, 2021, was not properly executed in that it does not bear the original signature of petitioner or of a practitioner admitted to practice before this Court.

The foregoing considered, it is

ORDERED that petitioner shall, on or before July 19, 2021, file with the Court in paper form (not electronic) a Ratification of Petition bearing an original signature (not a photocopy), preferably in blue ink, in which petitioner states, if such be the case, that petitioner has read the petition filed on March 15, 2021, and ratify and affirms the filing of said document. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to attach to the copy of this Order served on petitioner a form which may be used by petitioner for purposes of ratifying the petition.


Summaries of

Espinoza v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 7, 2021
No. 9882-21 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Espinoza v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Alexander Espinoza Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 7, 2021

Citations

No. 9882-21 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 7, 2021)