Espinoza v. Cnty. of Orange

Full title: RALPH ESPINOZA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, Defendant…

Court: COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

Date published: Mar 12, 2012

G043067 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 12, 2012)

Opinion

G043067 G043345

03-12-2012

RALPH ESPINOZA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, Defendant and Appellant.

RYLAARSDAM

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(Super. Ct. No. 30-2008-00110643)

ORDER MODIFYNG OPINION

AND DENYING PETITION FOR

REHEARING; NO CHANGE IN

JUDGMENT

It is ordered that the opinion filed on February 9, 2012 be modified as follows:

On page 20, in the last paragraph, delete the fourth sentence and replace it with the following: "Further, despite plaintiff and another employee telling several management personnel of potential violators, management interviewed none of the potential violators, including the individual defendants."

This modification does not change the judgment. The petition for rehearing is DENIED.

RYLAARSDAM, J.

WE CONCUR:

O'LEARY, P. J.

IKOLA, J.