From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Espinoza-Matthews v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 24, 2016
Case No. EDCV 03-921-BRO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. May. 24, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 03-921-BRO (LAL)

05-24-2016

ROBERT JEROME ESPINOZA-MATTHEWS, Petitioner, v. MIKE MCDONALD, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered denying the First Amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and
///
3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

Dated: May 24, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Espinoza-Matthews v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 24, 2016
Case No. EDCV 03-921-BRO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. May. 24, 2016)
Case details for

Espinoza-Matthews v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT JEROME ESPINOZA-MATTHEWS, Petitioner, v. MIKE MCDONALD, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 24, 2016

Citations

Case No. EDCV 03-921-BRO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. May. 24, 2016)