Espinosa v. Feather

Full title: JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUE ESPINOSA, Petitioner, v. MARION FEATHER, Respondent.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: May 12, 2015

Case No. 3: 14 CV 01745-TC (D. Or. May. 12, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3: 14 CV 01745-TC

05-12-2015

JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUE ESPINOSA, Petitioner, v. MARION FEATHER, Respondent.

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge

ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on April 15, 2015. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

Dated this 12 day of May, 2015.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge