From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Espino v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Sep 28, 2009
CASE NO. C09-5262RBL (W.D. Wash. Sep. 28, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. C09-5262RBL.

September 28, 2009


ORDER


The Court, having reviewed the record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) Plaintiff filed her Complaint on or about May 4, 2009. An Answer to the Complaint has not been filed, and plaintiff's attorney, Jean C. Owen, as only recently been granted leave to appear pro hac vice.

(2) Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires a defendant to be served within 120 days after the complaint is filed. Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 4(m). Rule 4(l) requires proof of service to be filed or made to the court. Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 4(l). At this time the record does not show that the complaint has been properly served.

(3) With regard to a social security complaint, Rule 4(i) requires plaintiff to serve a summons and copy of complaint on the following entities: (a) the United States attorney for the district in which the action is brought or to an assistant United States attorney or clerical employee designated by the United States attorney in a writing filed with the clerk of the court or the civil process clerk at the office of the United States attorney; (b) the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, District of Columbia; and (c) the officer or agency.

(4) Rule (4)(m) requires the court to provide notice to the plaintiff before the matter can be dismissed for lack of prosecution under that rule, and Rule 4(i)(4) requires the court to allow reasonable time for plaintiff to cure a failure to serve the multiple entities, if the plaintiff has effected service on either the United States attorney or the Attorney General of the United States.

(5) Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby notified that proof of service must be made to the court by not later than October 14, 2009. Otherwise, the court will recommend dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute the matter.


Summaries of

Espino v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Sep 28, 2009
CASE NO. C09-5262RBL (W.D. Wash. Sep. 28, 2009)
Case details for

Espino v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DOCINA R. ESPINO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Sep 28, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. C09-5262RBL (W.D. Wash. Sep. 28, 2009)