From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Espino v. Arnold

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2021
2:17-cv-2198 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)

Opinion

2:17-cv-2198 KJM AC P

06-15-2021

MARTIN ESPINO, Plaintiff, v. ERIC ARNOLD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated by defendants when they failed to properly secure him in a transport vehicle in June 2016. See generally ECF No. 17. On June 10, 2021, defendants filed a motion to opt out of the post-screening ADR project. ECF No. 38. Having reviewed the motion, the court finds good cause to grant it.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion to opt out of the ADR Project (ECF No. 38) is GRANTED;

2. The stay of this action (see ECF No. 37) is LIFTED, and

3. Within twenty-one days from the date of this order, defendants shall file a responsive pleading.


Summaries of

Espino v. Arnold

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2021
2:17-cv-2198 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Espino v. Arnold

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN ESPINO, Plaintiff, v. ERIC ARNOLD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 15, 2021

Citations

2:17-cv-2198 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)