From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Esperon v. Kelly

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 10, 2015
125 A.D.3d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

14170 104221/12

02-10-2015

In re Derek Esperon, Petitioner, v. Raymond Kelly, etc., Respondent.

Law Offices of John S. Chambers, New York (John S. Chambers of counsel), for petitioner. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Kathy Chang Park of counsel), for respondent.


, Friedman, Andrias, DeGrasse, Gische, JJ.

Law Offices of John S. Chambers, New York (John S. Chambers of counsel), for petitioner.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Kathy Chang Park of counsel), for respondent.

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated March 25, 2013, which revoked petitioner's premises-residence handgun license, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Donna M. Mills, J.], entered August 8, 2013), dismissed, without costs.

Respondent's determination adopting the recommendation of an Administrative Hearing Officer is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Perlov v Kelly, 21 AD3d 270 [1st Dept 2005]), and there exists no basis upon which to disturb the credibility determinations made by the Hearing Officer (see generally Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]). To the extent that petitioner frames his arguments as constitutional claims that his rights under the Second Amendment were violated, they are unpreserved; such arguments were not advanced at the agency level (see Matter of Health Tea Corp. v New York City Loft Bd., 162 AD2d 152, 153 [1st Dept 1990]). In any event, these arguments are unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 10, 2015

CLERK


Summaries of

Esperon v. Kelly

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 10, 2015
125 A.D.3d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Esperon v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:In re Derek Esperon, Petitioner, v. Raymond Kelly, etc., Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 10, 2015

Citations

125 A.D.3d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 1160
3 N.Y.S.3d 343

Citing Cases

Harvey v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Buildings

19[2], [6]). Petitioner did not preserve the argument that being charged in the disjunctive with negligence,…

Bradeanu v. Davis

orrectly found that respondent had a rational basis for denying the application based on its finding that…