From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Esparza v. Clark

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 6, 2022
CV 22-02945 ODW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-02945 ODW (KS)

07-06-2022

GERM AN ESPARZA, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”), all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the First Amended Petition is DISMISSED as untimely; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Esparza v. Clark

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 6, 2022
CV 22-02945 ODW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Esparza v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:GERM AN ESPARZA, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 6, 2022

Citations

CV 22-02945 ODW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2022)