From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eskridge v. Peters

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 16, 2008
C.A. No. 06-193 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jul. 16, 2008)

Opinion

C.A. No. 06-193 Erie.

July 16, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on August 24, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on May 30, 2008, recommended that this action be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail at SCI Forest, the last address of record, and on Defendant. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 16th day of July, 2008;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this complaint is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated May 30, 2008, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Eskridge v. Peters

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 16, 2008
C.A. No. 06-193 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jul. 16, 2008)
Case details for

Eskridge v. Peters

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH ESKRIDGE, Plaintiff, v. MS. PETERS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 16, 2008

Citations

C.A. No. 06-193 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jul. 16, 2008)