From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eshelman v. Orthoclear Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 4, 2009
No. C 07-1429 JSW (N.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2009)

Opinion

No. C 07-1429 JSW.

February 4, 2009


ORDER


In considering Defendants' motions to dismiss the third amended complaint, the Court would be greatly assisted by the submission of a side-by-side comparison of the relevant portions, or a redline version, of the third amended consolidated complaint, filed on July 24, 2007, and the second amended complaint, filed on February 19, 2008. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall submit such a comparison, preferably a redline version, of the two complaints by February 6, 2009.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Eshelman v. Orthoclear Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 4, 2009
No. C 07-1429 JSW (N.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Eshelman v. Orthoclear Holdings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL B. ESHELMAN, D.D.S.; PETER F. SILCHER, D.D.S.; and LORI SILCHER…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 4, 2009

Citations

No. C 07-1429 JSW (N.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2009)