Eshares, Inc. v. Fish & Richardson P.C.

Full title: ESHARES, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. FISH & RICHARDSON P.C., Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 25, 2022

22-MC-91 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. May. 25, 2022)

Opinion

22-MC-91 (JPO)

05-25-2022

ESHARES, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. FISH & RICHARDSON P.C., Respondent.

J. PAUL OETKEN, DISTRICT JUDGE:

ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, DISTRICT JUDGE:

Petitioners' motion to compel at Docket Number 8 is granted for substantially the reasons set forth in Petitioners' memorandum of law at Docket Number 9 and Petitioners' reply memorandum of law at Docket Number 17. Respondent is ordered to produce the 34 requested documents responsive to a subpoena issued by Petitioners out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 3:20-cv-7083.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 8 and close this case.

SO ORDERED.