From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Esensoy v. McMillan

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Feb 22, 2006
Case No. 2:05-CV-1063-WKW (WO) (M.D. Ala. Feb. 22, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-CV-1063-WKW (WO).

February 22, 2006


ORDER


On December 6, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 7) in this case, finding that the plaintiff's complaint is due to be dismissed on the grounds of judicial immunity and under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. The plaintiff filed an objection on December 16, 2005 (Doc. # 13). After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court finds that, pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, it does not have jurisdiction over this matter.

It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The objection (Doc. # 13) is OVERRULED.

2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #7) is ADOPTED.
3. The plaintiff's Motion to Correct Clerical Error (Doc. # 14) is GRANTED.
2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Esensoy v. McMillan

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Feb 22, 2006
Case No. 2:05-CV-1063-WKW (WO) (M.D. Ala. Feb. 22, 2006)
Case details for

Esensoy v. McMillan

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE C. ESENSOY, Plaintiff, v. H.W. "BUCKY" McMILLAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Feb 22, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:05-CV-1063-WKW (WO) (M.D. Ala. Feb. 22, 2006)